Room for improvement in adherence to ESC guidelines for heart failure treatment
Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12 440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry
Maggioni AP, Anker SD, Dahlström U, et al, on behalf of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA)
Eur J Heart Fail published 26 August 2013, 10.1093/eurjhf/hft134
BackgroundTherapeutic approaches for hospitalised patients with heart failure (HF) have changed little over the past decades. Trials have been conducted that have provided evidence on effective treatments that could be included in the recommendations of current guidelines [1-4]. However, treatment guidelines are adopted slowly or implemented inconsistently, thus failing to lead to improvements in patient care quality and outcomes [5-8].
The ESC-HF Pilot Survey showed that the rate of use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systemblockers (ACE-inhibitors, ARB and aldosterone blockers) and beta-adrenergic blockers was satisfactory, although the use of appropriate doses was suboptimal . Implantation of devices was often not according to criteria . Similarly, the EUROMED registry showed that the implantation rates of ICD and CRT were increasing over the past decade, but still below expectations based on recommendations .
The ESC Long-term Registry aims to evaluate how recommendations of most recent European guidelines are adopted, and if not, why not.
- Type of i.v. treatment for HF at hospital entry was quite often not according to ESC guidelines, e.g. a substantial number of patients received inotropes even with SBP values > 90 mmHg, and other received i.v. nitrate despite SBP < 100 mmHg.
- The use of recommended oral treatment had improved at discharge, as compared to the period preceding hospital admission.
- Intended use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers and MRAs in patients with reduced EF was 92.2%, 92.7% and 67% respectively. In a large majority of cases, reported contra-indications or a documented intolerance were the reason for non-prescription of recommended drugs. Real rates of undertreatment are 3.2%, 2.3% and 5.4% respectively. Less than one-third of patients received the target dosage as indicated by current guidelines. In a third of these cases this was because up-titration was still ongoing, while about the same amount of people the reasons were unclear.
- A majority (62.1%) of patients with an ICD, did not have clinical characteristics that would call for ICD implantation. On the other hand, about 10% of patients had the indication, but were not implanted. Similar figures were seen for implantation of a CRT.
ConclusionThis ESC Long-term registry reveals that currently a large proportion of patients with HF fails to receive the recommended drugs and/or the target dose. However, when taking into account the reasons for non-adherence to guidelines, the real rate of undertreatment or underdosage is acceptable. With regard to the use of oral treatments, this report shows that admission for HF is a concrete opportunity to optimise background therapy.
Device implantation was not significantly modified during or after hospital admission, and showed a greater gap between guidelines and practice.
1. Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur J Heart Fail 2008;10:933–989.
2. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:803–869.
3. Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, et al. 2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 2009;119:1977–2016.
4. Dickstein K, Vardas PE, Auricchio A, et al; Committee for Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2010 focused update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and
chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC Guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12:1143–1153.
5. Williams SC, Schmaltz SP, Morton DJ, et al. Quality of care in U.S. hospitals as reflected by standardized measures, 2002–2004. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 255–264.
6. Fonarow GC, YancyCW, Heywood JT, for the ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee, Study Group, and Investigators. Adherence to heart failure quality-of-care indicators in US hospitals: analysis of the ADHERE Registry. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165:1469–1477.
7. Shah B, Hernandez AF, Liang L, et al, for the Get With the Guidelines Steering Committee. Hospital variation
and characteristics of implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in patients with heart failure: data from the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:416–422.
8. Stafford RS, Radley DC. The underutilization of cardiac medications of proven benefit, 1990 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:56–61.
9. Fonarow GC, YancyCW, Albert NM, et al. Heart failure care in the outpatient cardiology practice setting: findings from IMPROVE HF. Circ Heart Fail 2008;1:98–106.
10. Maggioni AP, Dahlstro¨m U, Filippatos G et al on the behalf of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA). EUR Observational Research Program: The Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot). Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12: 1076–1084.
11. van Veldhuisen DJ, Maass AH, Priori SG, et al. Implementation of device therapy (cardiac resynchronization
therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator) for patients with heart failure in Europe: changes from 2004 to 2008. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:1143–1151.