First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
ESC 2017 - BarcelonaAug. 29, 2017 - news
Anacetrapib reduces risk of serious cardiovascular events in high risk patients on statins (REVEAL)
Presented at the ESC congress 2017 by: Martin Landray (Oxford, UK)
Clinical trials with cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, which increase HDL-c, have not been successful to date. These included trials with torcetrapib (unexpectedly high cardiovascular mortality), dalcetrapib or evacetrapib (lack of efficacy). Anacetrapib is a new CETP inhibitor that was evaluated in the REVEAL study. This study included many more patients and had a longer follow-up than earlier published studies evaluating CETP inhibitors. 30449 patients of at least 50 years old with vascular disease participated in the REVEAL study and received 100 mg anacetrapib or placebo daily, on top of atorvastatine (20 or 80 mg daily).
- During 4 years of follow-up 10.8% of anacetrapib-treated patienta and 11.8% of placebo-treated patients experienced a primary endpoint event (serious CV events among which coronary death, myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary revascularization). This translated into a 9% difference in events among both groups (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97, P=0.004). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the curves diverged after 2 years.
- A non-significant reduction of coronary death was seem (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06, P=0.25) and coronary revascularisation (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97, P=0.01). Reduction of MI and the composite endpoint coronary death and MI was significantly lower with anacetrapib (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, P=0.007 and HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, P=0.008, respectively).
- Median increase of HDL with anacetrapib was 43 mg/dL (doubling).
- Median reduction of non-HDL with anacetrapib was 17 mg/dL.
- LDL-c was well regulated during the trial: median 1.6 mmol/L (20% reduction).
- Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased slightly, but this did not translate into an increase of serious hypertension. A surprising decrease of new onset diabetes mellitus (DM) was seen with anacetrapib (5.3% vs 6.0% on placebo, P=0.05). Concerning renal disease, a decrease of new onset eGFR <60 mL/min/1.72 m2 was seen with anacetrapib (11.5% vs 10.6% on placebo, P=0.04).
- No safety signals were seen with regard to vascular, non-vascular death, or death by any cause, nor with regard to incidence of cancer, and complications relating tot he liver, muscles and cognitive function.
Treatment with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib resulted in a signficant reduction of serious coronary events. This was accompanied with a small reduction in the number of persons with new onset CM. Anacetrapib seems safe, considering absence of an excess of symptomatic complications and serious side-effects. A post-trial follow-up is planned in which patients will be followed for two extra years, while not taking anacetrapib anymore, to assess the efficacy and safety of anacetrapib in the long run.
During the discussion during the press conferences it was noted that the Kaplan-Meier curves diverged only after 2 years. Landray noted that this is comparable to other lipid-lowering studies. It is possible that other CETP inhibitor studies were too short to achieve an effect.
During the press conference, the attendants speculated about the mechanism through which anacetrapib might reduce the number of serious coronary events; possibly the effects on non-HDL play a role. Landray noted that an event reduction of 9% cannot be explained by only a doubling of HDL-c levels. Thus there must be other elements that lead to this, maybe the strongly decreased non-HDL-c. This reduction matches the curve of risk reduction of coronary death and MI events seen in LDL-c lowering statin studies. This hypothesis is corroborated by genetic studies that show that CETP-related variants that are associated with a lower coronary risk, are mostly associated with lower LDL. Thus, it appears as though non-HDL is the main cause of the observed effect of anacetrapib.
Finally, the clinical relevance of this 9% reduction of events was discussed. Landray emphasized the size of the study and the number of events despite maximal therapy. He considers this 9% reduction relevant for patients.
- Our reporting is based on the information provided at the ESC congress -