DPP-4 inhibition may reduce carotid atherosclerosis in T2DM patients in primary prevention
Sitagliptin on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes patients receiving primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A subgroup analysis of the PROLOGUE study
Introduction and methods
Studies evaluating the ability of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to decrease carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) have come to conflicting results [1-3]. A reasonable explanation for this might be that relevant studies enrolled different types of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients; the PROLOGUE study  enrolled patients with and without established CVD, whereas others included only those without CV events.
In this post hoc analysis of the PROLOGUE study , it was evaluated whether the effect of sitaglitin on carotid atherosclerosis differed between primary and secondary prevention groups.
PROLOGUE was a 2-year, prospective, randomized, open-label study, comparing the effect of sitagliptin with standard of care on carotid IMT progression in 442 T2DM patients. In this subanalysis of the study, the effect on sitagliptin and conventional therapy on changes in carotid -IMT measurements at 24 months were compared, in groups stratified according to presence or absence of previous CV events.
- Baseline-adjusted mean common carotid artery (CCA)-IMT at 24 months was 0.82 mm in both groups (mean difference: 0.000 mm; 95%CI: −0.022 to 0.022; P = 0.977) in the primary prevention subgroup, and 0.84 vs. 0.85 mm (mean difference: − 0.010 mm; 95%CI: −0.035 to 0.014; P=0.392) in the secondary prevention subgroup.
- Changes in mean and max internal carotid artery (ICA)-IMT at 24 months in the primary prevention subgroup were significantly lower in the sitagliptin group compared with the conventional therapy group (0.71 vs. 0.80; mean difference: −0.096 mm; 95%CI: −0.175 to −0.018; P=0.017; max difference: − 0.162 mm; 95%CI: −0.272 to −0.052; P=0.004).
DPP-4 inhibition with sitagliptin for 24 months decreased ICA-IMT in T2DM patients in primary prevention, although it did not decrease CCA-IMT neither in primary, nor in secondary prevention.
Share this page with your colleagues and friends: