Physicians' Academy for Cardiovascular Education

High HDL-C levels associated with higher CV risk in DM patients with low LDL-C

Sharif S et al., Diabetes Care. 2016

 
HDL Cholesterol as a Residual Risk Factor for Vascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes


Sharif S, van der Graaf Y, Nathoe HM, et al, on behalf of the SMART Study Group
Diabetes Care. 2016; published online ahead of print
 

Background

Current cardiovascular (CV) prevention guidelines mainly focus on LDL-C treatment with statin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), although the dyslipidaemia associated with T2DM is mainly characterised by high triglycerides, low HDL-C, and elevated small-dense LDL-C particles [1-3].
After effective LDL-C lowering in patients with T2DM, a significant residual risk for CV events remains, and it is hypothesised that this residual risk can be decreased, if plasma HDL-C levels are elevated [4-6]. However, whether HDL-C levels are an independent risk factor for CV disease even after efficacious LDL-C lowering, remains a matter of discussion [7,8].
This study evaluated whether low HDL-C levels remain a residual risk factor for CV disease and mortality in patients with T2DM when attaining low LDL-C treatment goals or when LDL-C is treated with intensive lipid-lowering therapy. For this purpose, data of 1829 T2DM patients with clinically manifest vascular disease or with known important risk factors of the prospective SMART (Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease) cohort study [8] were used. A total of 335 new CV events and 385 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 7.0 years (IQR: 3.9–10.4).
 

Main results

  • In all patients with T2DM, the risk of MI decreased by 7% per 0.1 mmol/L increase in HDL-C (adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–1.00), but there was no clear association with any other CV end point. No association was found between plasma HDL-C and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96–1.03).
  • In patients with LDL-C levels <2.0 mmol/L, higher HDL-C was related to higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07–1.22). A 0.1 mmol/L higher HDL-C was related to a higher risk of vascular mortality (HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.03–1.22). Higher HDL-C was related to a higher risk for CV events (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02–1.18).
  • In patients with LDL-C levels between 2.0 and 2.5 mmol/L, higher HDL-C was related to a lower risk  of CV events (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75–0.95).  
  • No evidence was seen for effect modification of the relation between HDL-c and CV events or mortality by lipid-lowering therapy or the intensity thereof.
  • In patients on intensive lipid-lowering therapy, a 0.1 mmol/L increase in HDL-C was associated with a 17% higher risk for MI (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.00–1.37), while a 15% lower risk for MI (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74–0.99) in patients on usual dose lipid-lowering therapy.
 

Conclusion

In high-risk T2DM patients, the relationship between HDL-C levels and CV event risk is dependent on LDL-C levels. When LDL-C levels <2.0 mmol/L, higher HDL-C was associated with a higher risk for CV events and all-cause mortality. On the other hand, in high-risk T2DM patients with LDL-C between 2.0 and 2.5 mmol/L, higher HDL-C was related to a decreased risk of CV events.
 
Find this article online at Diabetes Care
 

References

1. Mooradian AD. Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2009;5:150–159
2. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al.; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129(Suppl. 2):S1–S45
3. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, et al.; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) 2008-2010 and 2010-2012 Committees. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 2011;32:1769–1818
4. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, et al.; CARDS investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS):multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:685–696
5. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, et al.; ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetesmellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563–1574
6. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, et al.; FIELD study investigators. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:1849–1861
7. Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, et al.; HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2014;371:203–212
8. van de Woestijne AP, van der Graaf Y, Liem AH, et al; SMART Study Group. Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is not a risk factor for recurrent vascular events in patients with vascular disease on intensive lipid-lowering medication. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1834–1841