No benefit statin use for primary prevention in the elderly
Effect of Statin Treatment vs Usual Care on Primary Cardiovascular Prevention Among Older Adults
The ALLHAT-LLT Randomized Clinical Trial
Literature - Han BH, Sutin D, Williamson JD et al. - JAMA intern med 2017; epub ahead of printMain results
- Years of follow-up differed significantly between pravastatin-treated patients and usual care patients (4.63 vs. 4.77 years, P=0.04). Also, number of patients above 75 years taking antihypertensive medications and the blood pressure differed significantly between treatment groups at baseline.
- Total cholesterol as well as LDL-c levels were lower at the 2-year, 4-year and 6-year follow-up visits in the pravastatin group compared with the usual care group across all age groups. In the pravastatin group, LDL-c changed from 147.7 to 109.1 mg/dL at year 6, which was 147.6 to 128.8 mg/dL in the usual care group.
- All-cause mortality was higher in the pravastatin group compared with the usual care group in both age groups (65-74yrs HR 1.08 ,95% CI 0.85-1.37, P=0.55 and ≥75yrs 1.34 ,95% CI 0.98-1.84, P=0.07).
- Regarding coronary heart disease, HRs were 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-1.15, P=0.29) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.43-1.13, P=0.14) for patients 65-74yrs and 75 yrs, respectively.
- Also stroke, heart failure and cancer rates were similar between 2 treatment groups for both age groups.
- Using multivariable cox regression, the adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 1.15 (95% CI 0.94-1.39, P=0.17) for 65 years and older, 1.05 (95% CI 0.82-1.33) for 65-74 years and 1.36 (95% CI 0.98-1.89) for above 75 years (P interaction = 0.24).
Conclusion
Newly administered statin use for primary prevention had no benefit on all-cause mortality of coronary heart disease events compared to usual care in adults older than 65 years with hypertension and moderate hypercholesterolemia in the ALLHAT-LLT trial. In contrast, a non-significant direction towards increased all-cause mortality was noted with the use of pravastatin in patients of 75yrs and older.
Editorial comment
In this editorial [8], Dr. Curfman mentions that the US preventative services task force last year concluded that there is insufficient evidence to conclude about the balance of benefits and harms of statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in adults older than 75 years. Nevertheless, they are commonly prescribed to these patients and the prevalence of use is increasing. He notes that there is limited data about statin use in the patient group from the PROSPER, JUPITER and HOPE-3 clinical trials, in which is concluded that there is modest benefit on composite cardiovascular outcomes but not on all-cause mortality. He further elaborates on the trend towards increased mortality when using pravastatin in the ALLHAT-LLT trial, in which side effects known for statins may play a role.
Share this page with your colleagues and friends: