Physicians' Academy for Cardiovascular Education

AF more often detected by implantable vs. external loop recorder after stroke

Effect of Implantable vs Prolonged External Electrocardiographic Monitoring on Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Patients With Ischemic Stroke: The PER DIEM Randomized Clinical Trial

Literature - Buck BH, Hill MD, Quinn FR et al. - JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2160-2168. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6128.

Introduction and methods

Approximately one-third of all ischemic strokes is caused by atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter [1]. Guidelines suggest etiologic investigations in patients with recent ischemic stroke, without evidence of AF on ECG and Holter monitoring [2,3]. It has been shown that both external and implantable loop recorders improve detection of AF in patients with a recent ischemic stroke [4-6]. However, a direct comparison of the detection rates of AF with an external loop recorder versus an implantable loop recorder is missing. This randomized clinical trial compared the detection rate of AF with use of an implantable loop recorder for 12 months vs. use of an external loop recorder for 30 days in patients with a recent ischemic stroke and without known AF.

The Post-Embolic Rhythm Detection with Implantable vs External Monitoring (PER DIEM) trial was an investigator-initiated, open-label trial which was conducted at 3 hospitals in Alberta, Canada. A total of 300 patients (median age 64.1 years, 40.3% women, median CHA2DS2VASc score 4) with recent ischemic stroke (≤6 months before randomization) and without known AF were randomized to receive either an external loop recorder for 30 days (n=150) or an implantable loop recorder (n=150). The primary outcome was definite or highly probable new AF, defined as adjudicated new AF lasting >2 minutes within 12 months of randomization. Reported secondary outcomes included a composite endpoint of AF lasting ≥2 minutes or death within 12 months, time to event analysis of new AF, recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, intracerebral hemorrhage, death and device-related adverse events within 12 months.

Main results

Conclusion

Definite of highly probable AF was detected significantly more often by implantable loop recorder monitoring for 12 months compared to external loop recorder monitoring for 30 days in patients with recent ischemic stroke without known AF.

References

Show references

Find this article online at JAMA.

Share this page with your colleagues and friends: