CVD risk associated with high Lp(a) reduced at low LDL-c in primary prevention setting

04/07/2018

In two prospective population cohorts, the increased CVD risk in individuals with high Lp(a) levels was reduced when LDL-c levels were <2.5 mmol/L.

Cardiovascular disease risk associated with elevated lipoprotein(a) attenuates at low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in a primary prevention setting
Literature - Verbeek R, Hoogeveen RM, Langsted A, et al. - Eur Heart J 2018; published online ahead of print

Introduction and methods

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for CVD and a causal association has been shown in Mendelian randomization studies [1-4]. It has been suggested that elevated Lp(a) predominantly causes CVD together with high levels of LDL-c [5 -6]. However, the question remains whether CVD risk associated with high Lp(a) levels is reduced in individuals with low LDL-c levels.

To test the association of Lp(a) and LDL-c with the risk of CVD incidence and mortality, data of two large prospective cohort studies were used.

Participants in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk prospective population study enrolled between 1993 and 1997 and participants of the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) prospective population study examined from 1991 to 1994 and 2001 to 2003 were included in this study.

Those with myocardial infarction, stroke or lipid-lowering therapy at baseline, missing LDL-c or Lp(a) levels, and non-Caucasian individuals were excluded, leaving a study population of 16,654 participants from EPIC-Norfolk and 9448 participants from the CCHS.

Individuals were divided in groups by Lp(a) and LDL-c cut-offs. Low Lp(a) was defined as<80th cohort percentile in both cohorts based on the EAS proposed threshold for Lp(a) [7]. LDL-c was corrected for Lp(a)-derived LDL-c (LDL-ccorr) [8] and groups were created for LDL-ccorr levels <2.5, 2.5-3.49, 3.5-4.49, 4.5-5.49 and ≥5.5 mmol/L.

Atherosclerotic CVD events in this study included coronary heart disease, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and fatal- or non-fatal stroke.

Main results

  • Participants in EPIC-Norfolk with a Lp(a) <80th cohort percentile and LDL-ccorr ≥5.5 mmol/L had an HR of 1.61 (95%CI: 1.29-2.00, P<0.001), compared to individuals with LDL-ccorr <2.5 mmol/L.
  • Participants in EPIC-Norfolk with a Lp(a) ≥80th cohort percentile and LDL-ccorr ≥5.5 mmol/L had an HR of 2.17 (95%CI: 1.58-2.98, P<0.001) and those with an LDL-ccorr<2.5 mmol/L had an HR of 1.11 (95%CI: 0.77-1.59, P=0.57), compared to individuals with a Lp(a) <80th percentile and LDL-ccorr <2.5 mmol/L.
  • Participants in CCHS with a Lp(a) <80th cohort percentile and LDL-ccorr ≥5.5 mmol/L had an HR of 1.42 (95%CI: 1.15-1.74, P<0.001), compared to individuals with LDL-ccorr <2.5 mmol/L.
  • Compared with LDL-ccorr <2.5 mmol/L, participants in CCHS with a Lp(a) ≥80th cohort percentile and LDL-ccorr ≥5.5 mmol/L had an HR of 2.34 (95%CI: 1.63-3.35, P<0.001) while those with an LDL-ccorr<2.5 mmol/L had an HR of 1.08 (95%CI: 0.85-1.38, P=0.48), compared to individuals with a Lp(a) <80th percentile and LDL-ccorr ≥5.5 mmol/L.
  • There was no significant interaction between LDL-ccorr and Lp(a) levels on CVD risk in either cohort (EPIC-Norfolk: P=0.80 and CCHS: P=0.11).

Conclusion

This study confirmed that Lp(a) and LDL-c are independently associated with CVD risk in a primary prevention setting. The increased CVD risk at high Lp(a) concentrations is reduced at low LDL-c levels, however, no interaction was observed between Lp(a) and LDL-ccorr levels on CVD risk.

References

1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA 2009;302:412–423.

2. Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, et al. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA 2009; 301:2331–2339.

3. Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, et al. Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2518–2528.

4. Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A. Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. J Lipid Res 2016;57: 1953–1975.

5. Afshar M, Pilote L, Dufresne L, et al. Lipoprotein(a) interactions with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other cardiovascular risk factors in premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5: e003012–e003019.

6. Suk Danik J, Rifai N, Buring JE, et al. Lipoprotein(a), measured with an assay independent of apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, and risk of future cardiovascular events among initially healthy women. JAMA 2006;296:1363–1370.

7. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Ray K, et al. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2844–2853.

8. Viney NJ, Yeang C, Yang X, et al. Relationship between ‘LDL-C’, estimated true LDL-C, apolipoprotein B-100, and PCSK9 levels following lipoprotein(a) lowering with an antisense oligonucleotide. J Clin Lipidol 2018; 12:707–710.

Find this article online at Eur Heart J

Register

We're glad to see you're enjoying PACE-CME…
but how about a more personalized experience?

Register for free