Similar bleeding with DOAC as with LMWH in those with cancer-associated thrombosis
Bleeding with Apixaban and Dalteparin in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Results from the Caravaggio Study.
Literature - Ageno W, Vedovati MC, Cohen A, et al. - Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov 17. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1720975.Introduction and methods
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a similar efficacy profile compared to subcutaneous injected low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) in patients treated for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) [1]. However, safety concerns were raised by clinical trials that reported increased rates of major bleeding events, mostly occurring at the gastrointestinal tract, in patients with CAT using the DOAC edoxaban or rivaroxaban [2,3]. Recent guidelines have favored the use of DOACs in patients with CAT, but have advised caution or exclusion in patients with gastrointestinal cancer [1, 4-7].
This subanalysis of the Caravaggio study compared the sites of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events, associated cancer sites, clinical presentation, and course of major bleeding in patients with CAT receiving either the DOAC apixaban or the LMWH dalteparin.
The Caravaggio study was a multinational, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study with blind adjudication of the study outcomes. Patients (n=1,155) with cancer or diagnosed with cancer within 2 years before study inclusion and presenting with symptomatic or incidental proximal lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were included. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apixaban, 10 mg orally twice a day for 7 days followed by 5 mg bid or 200 IU/kg dalteparin subcutaneously, daily, for 1 month followed by 150 IU/kg od (maximum daily dose was 18,000 IU). Treatment duration was 6 months. Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in 5,6% of patients treated with apixaban compared to 7.9% of patients receiving dalteparin (HR 0.63, 95%CI: 0.37-1.07). Major bleeding was present in 3.8% of patients with apixaban and in 4.0% in those treated with dalteparin (HR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.40-1.69) [8].
Major bleeding events were classified using the European Medicines Agency (EMA) definition. These included clinically overt bleeding associated with a decline of ≥2 g/dL in hemoglobin, bleeding that required 2 or more units of blood transfusion, bleeding that occurred at a critical site, fatal bleeding, and bleeding events resulting in surgical intervention. CRNMB events were defined as acute clinically overt bleeding that did not meet the EMA definitions, but required medical intervention by a health caretaker.
Main results
- Major bleeding events were present in 22 patients treated with apixaban compared to 23 patients on dalteparin. Number of bleeding risk factors were similar in both treatment groups.
- There was 1 bleeding event in a critical site in the group treated with apixaban compared to 5 in the dalteparin group. Bleeding events that needed surgical intervention occurred in 4 patients using apixaban and no patient treated with dalteparin. Fatal bleedings occurred in 2 patients that received dalteparin.
- There were 52 CRNMB events in patients treated with apixaban compared to 35 events in those receiving dalteparin. The median time to a CRNMB was 48 days in the apixaban group and 28 days in the dalteparin group.
- Major bleeding events that required hospitalization occurred in 8 patients in the apixaban group compared to 13 in the dalteparin group.
- The majority of major bleedings were gastrointestinal bleedings, 11 in the apixaban group compared to 10 in the dalteparin. The number of major bleedings in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract were comparable in the two treatment groups.
- 7 Patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract treated with apixaban experienced a major bleeding compared to 9 patients receiving dalteparin.
- The clinical presentation of bleeding was severe or fatal in 6 patients on apixaban vs. 5 on dalteparin, while the clinical course was life-threatening or fatal in 5 patients treated with apixaban and 7 patients receiving dalteparin.
Conclusion
The number of bleedings as well as the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events in patients treated for CAT were similar in the apixaban and dalteparin treatment groups. These findings were consistent across various cancers, including different gastrointestinal tumor types.
References
1. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020;41(04):543–603
2. Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P, et al; Hokusai VTE Cancer Investigators. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2018;378(07):615–624
3. Young AM, Marshall A, Thirlwall J, et al. Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol 2018;36(20):2017–2023
4. Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2020;38(05): 496–520
5. Khorana AA, Noble S, Lee AYY, et al. Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2018;16(09):1891–1894
6. Farge D, Frere C, Connors JM, et al; International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC) advisory panel. 2019 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(10):e566–e581
7. Streiff MB, Holmstrom B, Angelini D, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16(11):1289–1303
Facebook Comments